Subject:
|
Re: Why sets receive a ZERO?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 17 Nov 2002 16:29:53 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
370 times
|
| |
|
|
"Ken Godawa" <kengod@y-comm.com> wrote in message
news:H5pqzu.Mq1@lugnet.com...
> I'm curious on why so many of the popular sets receive a "zero" rating.
> It just doesn't make any sense. Unless it's a valid reason, these ratings
> should be thrown out. Either these people are jealous or
> complete morons.
Where are these ratings taking place?
Without seen the rating system mentioned I can say that there is a way to
get this rating better. Like IMDb (Internet Movie Database), there you can
see how many that have given a specific rating score. In IMDb there are
ratings from 0 to 10 where 10 is highest. As someone said in this thread,
some rate 0 just of childishness, and other probably rate max just of
excitment of a new film. So to REALY analyze the voting, you have to see
which rate has got most votes and where the other votes has gone.
To just take the average of the votes can give a wrong images of the rating.
Just a though.....
Regards
Øyvind Steinnes
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Why sets receive a ZERO?
|
| Hello! (...) You can rate a set directly on its page in the LUGNET database - if you are a member. There you can also add a comment to a set and mark it as "own", "want to by" or "want to sell", both private and public. This it what it looks like: (...) (22 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Why sets receive a ZERO?
|
| I'm curious on why so many of the popular sets receive a "zero" rating. It just doesn't make any sense. Unless it's a valid reason, these ratings should be thrown out. Either these people are jealous or complete morons. (22 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.general)
|
48 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
