| |
In lugnet.trains, Ben Fleskes writes:
<snip>
> Regarding height adjustment.
>
> I've had a chance to see what SCLTC have done with their tables and really
> like the ease at which they can stack tables and have tables at multiple
> heights. One thing I'm thinking might be useful is to have adjustable feet
> on the end of the legs.
>
>
I built these modules this weekend--
http://sparky.i989.net/legop2.htm
Completely based on the PNLTC module design--very nice by the way--many
kudos to whoever came up with that particular concept first!
Anyway, rtlToronto got hold of the plans and modified with "RayCraft
Specs"--Take a close look at either of those pics of modules--note the
adjustable feet. Very inexpensive and completely easy to do--Home Depot has
all the parts needed, as I'm sure most hardware stores. Adjustablility is
approx 3 inches for my table legs--all depends on what bolt you use.
Dave K
<snip>
> Ben Fleskes
> PNLTC
<snip>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Train Layout Tables
|
| Hey, nifty stuff. Thanks for sharing! But since we're sharing table info, and not discussing the merits of an additional group, do you think it might be possible to trim admin.suggestions from the groups list? FUT just trains... (...) <snip> (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Train Layout Tables
|
| I've been bouncing table designs around for a while and two criteria seem to emerging in my mind as more important than I've previously given weight to. 1) Durability. and 2) The ability to adjust height On Durability. My first tables are over six (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
35 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
