Subject:
|
Re: MoTeC rule question.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Sun, 12 May 2002 16:44:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1041 times
|
| |
|
|
> How are things such as ballast be allowed in the contest where these shims
> are not. Ballast effects over stablity on structures and without it, some
> structures will not work. There are even lego elements which are
> specifically designed for this task.
I think it's the 2x6 weight you refer too?
It's very hard to find that part outside US w/o using Bricklink since
Dacta is limited.
Still, they are very expensive. Come to think about it a batterybox
should do the trick in most cases.
The rules were equally discussed in the beginning and nobody mentioned
shims AFAIK but ballast sprung into discussion and nobody was against
it.
Here it is:
http://news.lugnet.com/technic/?n=6605
/Tobbe
http://www.arnesson.nu/lotek/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: MoTeC rule question.
|
| (...) Nope, and I'll tell you why. It is my MOC which is subject to debate. In my shrimp rover, on one of the wheels I used the non-lego parts which are in question. Here is the picture: (URL) is the MOC: (URL) you can clearly see the two plastic (...) (23 years ago, 11-May-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
40 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
