Subject:
|
Re: MoTeC rule question.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Tue, 7 May 2002 23:45:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
883 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.technic, Steven Lane writes:
>
> I think if we follow this route we should split the competiton into two
> catagories. Keep the current rules and add a parallel class for models
> containing modified parts. I realise this would create more complexity but I
> think it would be worth it.
>
> The reason I think we should do this is because if we lump all the model's
> together, the model's with modified parts would have an unfair advantage
> over the others. The other advantage of two competitions, would be that it
> would encourage development of both types of building simultaneously.
I've gotta disagree here - sometimes finding the best way using modified parts
is just as much a challenge as doing it "pure". (Yes, I have used some modified
parts - I just don't like to broadcast it!.)
So I'd like to see models with minor mods welcomed in MoTeC with open arms -
there's already too much compartmental dorkism in the world 8?) I see it as no
worse than (as others have mentioned) non-LEGO string, ballast etc, which are
specifically allowed (and have been used by yours truly). Does there need to be
a limit to the amount of modification? Probably not - models with too much will
probably get less votes, anyway.
Just my AU$0.04
ROSCO
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: MoTeC rule question.
|
| (...) I've never had any problems. (...) I think if we follow this route we should split the competiton into two catagories. Keep the current rules and add a parallel class for models containing modified parts. I realise this would create more (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
40 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
