To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.spaceOpen lugnet.space in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Space / 25439
25438  |  25440
Subject: 
Re: Hypothetical design question
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.space
Date: 
Mon, 23 Jun 2003 21:17:06 GMT
Viewed: 
494 times
  
In lugnet.space, Rick Hallman wrote:
   In lugnet.space, Mark Sandlin wrote:
   One of the cool things about space is that you can always rationalize it with some kind of nifty technology, like navigational shields. :D

I don’t think those micro-particles would care if your ship is aerodynamic, since there’s no air in space to carry the particles around the aerodynamic shape. (does that make sense?)

Yeah, but also in aerodynamics and hydrodynamics, the sleeker it is, the less resistance it encounters on it’s forward edge. If you minimize the amount of forward contact on the front, less particles would hit it, causing less overall damage. Think of it as Radar... a 747 which is big, and not very aerodynamic, produces a huge Radar image, while the B-2, or the F-22 Raptor, which are rather sleek and aerodynamic, produce a small radar image.

Although you still would need to deal with the ones that hit the ship.

I think this point is dead on! Even though these ships are aerodynamic, they aren’t SO aerodynamic that they deflect photons! and while photons are much smaller than your average particle out there, the particles that are present in a vacuum of space wouldn’t be all that big anyway.

while i agree an aerodynamic shape might help deflect (i can’t say it will without some experimental justification) particles, i think sooner or later you’re gonna have to deal with a particle bombardment. and that means, energy deflector shield of some sort.

-Jr.Mar.Hoffman




Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Hypothetical design question
 
(...) Yeah, but also in aerodynamics and hydrodynamics, the sleeker it is, the less resistance it encounters on it's forward edge. If you minimize the amount of forward contact on the front, less particles would hit it, causing less overall damage. (...) (21 years ago, 23-Jun-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)

57 Messages in This Thread:



























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR