Subject:
|
Re: how large would the ISD be compared to the Enterprise-D?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Fri, 18 Oct 2002 14:10:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
31 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, Adrick Tolliver writes:
> The conclusions drawn by Dr. Saxton in his Technical Commentaries are false.
> The "true" (as true as any fictional ship can get) length of a Super Star
> Destroyer is either 12,800 meters as stated on SW.com's databanks, or the
> 8000 meter RPG length. Both are official, and appear in *official* LFL
> products. Saxton's site is completely inaccurate, as he fails to take the
> official material into account (not just with the SSD article, the errors
> and fallacies on his site are too numerous to list.) An accurate
> perspective can *not* be achieved from the shots in the movie (there is no
> way to accurately judge distances by sight in space) or by measuring the
> models used in the film (model sizes do not always correspond directly with
> the sizes of other models.)
You can NOT go based off what the SW.com database has. That is not offical!
(Hear me out before you start screaming). Mr Lucas himself did NOT enter in
the data into the DB. But Mr. Lucas himeself did supervise and create all
the stuff for the movies (ep 4-6). At the beginning of the Technical
Commentaries they state that the ONLY Offical stuff is the movies (since
Lucas himself did those). They further go on to explain how they are doing
measurements in space, etc..
So until Mr. Lucas himself quotes something on sw.com nothing on their can
be offical.
<snip>
-AHui
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
83 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
