Subject:
|
Re: how large would the ISD be compared to the Enterprise-D?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 18:36:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
12 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, David Koudys writes:
> In lugnet.starwars, James Wilson writes:
> > In lugnet.starwars, Richard Tysoe writes:
> > > In lugnet.starwars, Jonathan Wilson writes:
> > > > How large compared to an ISD would NCC-1701D aka Enterprise-D be?
> > >
> > > IIRC, the enterprise-D is supposed to be just under a kilometer long, so it
> > > would be just under 2/3rds the length of an imperial-class star
> > > destroyer(1.6 Km or a mile)
> >
> > Okay, next question: how big would the original Enterprise (original series)
> > be? (somewhat serious)
> > How about the aircraft carrier Enterprise (WWII)? (somewhat not serious)
> > Or modern Big-E aircraft carrier? (somewhat not serious)
> >
> > Or, an even more geeky question, Could Mighty Mouse beat up Superman?
> > (really not serious)
> >
> > James Wilson
> > Lugnet #1783
>
> IIRC, I saw an overlay of the top view of 1701-D on the modern Enterprise
> aircraft carrier--they were the same length--front of saucer to back of
> nacelle is the same length as bow to stern.
>
> 1701-D was somewhat wider than the aircraft carrier, though ;)
>
> 1701 from TOS, as well as 1701 and 1701-A from first 6 movies is half the
> length of 1701-D (again, IIRC)
>
> 1701 = 24 decks, 1701-D = 42 decks (all from my dusty recollection)
That was a major screw-up in the movie! The shaft they were in is only a
little over 115 feet deep. Unless they suddenly decided that all the decks
were half height... Actually, (according to the deck plans) the NCC-1701-A
has fewer decks than the original Enterprise - they made more open spaces.
Wayne
>
> So there you are.
>
> Dave K
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
83 Messages in This Thread:
   
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
