Subject:
|
Re: Mindstorms NXT programming languages
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:39:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3609 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Chris Magno wrote:
> Kevin L. Clague wrote:
>
>
> >
> > I'm sure that LEGO has scrutinzed and wrestled with cost issues much smaller
> > than $5 per manufactured NXT. $5 is a big number when talking about small
> > volumes of a $250 set.
> >
> > That said, you can go ahead with your continued "coherent and resonable
> > areguments about your teeny-tiny $5 flash" without any more feedback from me.
> >
> > Have a nice day,
> > Kev
>
>
>
> Kevin,
>
> While I agree with your points regarding cost/features; and I can
> understand the view of the "need more memory" crowd. I think what needs
> to be expressed more "eloquently" is the fact that while starting from
> the ground up, Lego seemed to have "miss the boat" on a ~few~ features.
Chris,
I don't believe I've ever taken the stance that I don't want more memory in
the NXT. I can't imagine that I'd ever take that position.
I'm not opposed to more memory, but I am trying to see, understand and share
what little I know about the economics on some of this.
I was hoping for an expansion port to allow for easy growth of the NXT. For a
while I thought maybe that was what the USB was for, but alas it cannot do that
and appears to be limited to downloading programs.
Then I started thinking about what kind of expansion port I'd like. PCMCIA is
pretty limiting. My PC only has one slot. PCI is too expensive and difficult
to work with, so I started thinking about simpler interfaces. I2C came to mind.
It is a simple two wire interface often used to interface to serial memory
chips, but also interface to lots of kinds of lab equipment. I wonder if the
digital sensor interface is I2C or some other two wire interace.
I guess that the digital sensor interface is our best hope for expansion.
Kev
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Mindstorms NXT programming languages
|
| (...) Kevin, While I agree with your points regarding cost/features; and I can understand the view of the "need more memory" crowd. I think what needs to be expressed more "eloquently" is the fact that while starting from the ground up, Lego seemed (...) (19 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
52 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
