To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 25194
25193  |  25195
Subject: 
Re: Mindstorms NXT programming languages
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:51:08 GMT
Viewed: 
2366 times
  
On Fri, January 13, 2006 1:59 pm, steve wrote:
John Barnes wrote:

Agreed! And if they did come up with a PC in a brick, you'd have to put new
batteries in it every few minutes :)

Oh *please*.  These are a pair of unjustified responses - you
guys both know better.

Now this is funny.

Are you suggesting (A) JB doesn't know much about hardware or (B) JB doesn't know
about LEGO's development process?

If you select (A) or (B), you should rethink your answer.


On Fri, January 13, 2006 1:23 pm, steve wrote:
If I was asking for something unreasonable (like a Terrabyte
of memory), then that would be one thing - but I'm not.
I'm asking for about the amount memory than my telephone has!

My two year old cell phone has 32k of memory, just like my eight yr old RCX.

I really can't imagine doing image processing on an NXT.  I can't imagine anyone on
my First LEGO League, or in our local LEGO club doing image processing.

I think it would be hard to get an image into an NXT, because LEGO doesn't make a
camera that will connect to the NXT.  So, when you add a camera, why not put the
memory in the camera, and let it do the processing.

On the other hand, this may be another unjustified response.  I should know better.

Steve Hassenplug
Mindstorms User Panel.



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Mindstorms NXT programming languages
 
(...) EXACTLY. And my three-month-old cell phone has 4M of memory (which is needs because it has a camera in it), but my not-born-yet NXT will have 256k+64k. Over eight years, most devices have increased in memory capacity by a factor of maybe 100 (...) (19 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
  Re: Mindstorms NXT programming languages
 
(...) Sorry Steve, But, are you saying because ~YOU~ or your group can not imagine it, then is should not or cannot be done? Chris (19 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Mindstorms NXT programming languages
 
(...) That's because most people have a reasonable 'feel' for what will fit into the RCX and won't even attempt to fit in something that they can tell just by looking won't come close to fitting. I *KNOW* without looking that I can't do image (...) (19 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)

52 Messages in This Thread:



















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR