Subject:
|
Re: Searching for alternatives
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 7 Feb 2001 06:07:35 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Malcolm S Powell <msp@umbra.co.&saynotospam&uk>
|
Viewed:
|
1464 times
|
| |
|
|
> "Steve Baker" <lego-robotics@crynwr.com> wrote
>
> > If you *ONLY* want to use NQC, yes. But if you want to write large,
> > complex AI programs and have them drive the robot from an on-board
> > computer, then I don't think Wince is a good choice because I strongly
> > *suspect* that the tools and API documentation needed for writing new
> > Wince programs are *far* from free.
Actually, the "Windows® CE eMbedded Visual Tools 3.0" cost $7.50 direct from
Microsoft and let you develop in Visual Basic and C++. The VB is a cut down
version, more like VB Script, but will drive the serial port. I have not tried
the C++ as I am allergic to C-like languages.
See http://developerstore.com/devstore/product.asp and select the "Windows® CE
eMbedded Visual Tools 3.0" link at bottom left of the page. Please don't let me
know if anyone buy this from Microsoft as a result of my post as I will be very
ashamed:-)
Malcolm S Powell
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Searching for alternatives
|
| "Steve Baker" <lego-robotics@crynwr.com> wrote in message news:3A7FFB5B.EF74DE...ail.net... (...) I would agree with that totally - I hadn't realized there was a need for higher computing. (...) ...beacuse I don't write computer programs, and I (...) (24 years ago, 6-Feb-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
31 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
