Publishing : 1348

Publishing / 1348

1347 | 1349

Subject:	Re: LEGO trademark (was: Re: What I did for the Y2K weekend...[lego phone])
Newsgroups:	lugnet.publish
Date:	Wed, 5 Jan 2000 13:23:58 GMT
Viewed:	5160 times

On Tue, 4 Jan 2000 02:29:16 GMT, mattdm@mattdm.org (Matthew Miller) wrote: > Of course, if you're polite about it, as a non-lawyer and non-Lego-employee, > I advocate calling the product "Lego" and (gasp!) "Legos" in casual > conversation. (Out of politeness, it's not good to do this in more permanent > locations, like user group propaganda or on web pages.) What about LUGnet? Posts are archived essentially forever, after all. (And I suspect that even if Todd's were to suddenly go offline, they could be pieced together fromthe archives in various formats on people's newsreaders/email clients..) Jasper

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: LEGO trademark (was: Re: What I did for the Y2K weekend...[lego phone])
(...) Archived forever != formal. It's all grey area ('cept when you're selling stuff), so if you don't feel comfortable using Lego as a noun here, by all means don't. (27 years ago, 5-Jan-00, to lugnet.publish)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: LEGO trademark (was: Re: What I did for the Y2K weekend...[lego phone])
(...) Yep, that's pretty much what they ask you to say. You can shorten it to just "LEGO bricks", if you want. <URL:(URL), of course. Of course, if you're polite about it, as a non-lawyer and non-Lego-employee, I advocate calling the product "Lego" (...) (27 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.publish)

55 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact