Subject:
|
Re: rtlToronto19: Balance of Power and other upcoming events
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Thu, 3 Mar 2005 20:48:53 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
607 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Calum Tsang wrote:
> You know, I didn't realize that it doesn't make any sense at all :) (or was I
> trying to make it look like an Escher drawing? you decide!) I guess it would
> be immediately below the beam itself.
That'd be ideal, offsets is nasty foo.
> I think, it was either Iain or John, who said if we put the broomstick thingy in
> the base, it would make everyone need to use it and would basically force a
> given strategy. I guess it is overwhelmingly attractive as a strategy to grab
> the broomstick.
I was just saying it should be oriented the way you've shown it, vs. 90 degrees
to that, because if it's the other way then you have to traverse a fixed amount
of beam before you can reach down and get it. This way, it doesnt' matter when
you clasp onto it or at what position you're at - leaves it more open.
> Would you want it there? I think Iain (or John?) didn't think it was a good
> idea.
I still have mixed feelings about it. Need to discuss more/let it marinade
more. :)
Iain
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
61 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
