Subject:
|
Re: Track on the modules
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Tue, 5 Jun 2001 02:59:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
487 times
|
| |
|
|
"Calum Tsang" <tsangc@mie.utoronto.ca> wrote in message
news:GEFqqr.EKo@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Iain Hendry writes:
> > I don't see why we don't use the PNLTC specs - Geometrically they operate
> > nicely. It would be foolish to try and run the track according to road
> > plates, anyway - the spacing would be all over the place. It makes far • more
> > sense to use one strip of 3 32x32 plates along the leading edge of the
> > module for the track, then use the remaining 6 sectors for road plates. • That
> > is more realistic, anyway.
>
> Are you building me the three extra modules I now need? :)
I really don't think that's the issue - It's not my fault you went ahead and
built your modules before we had all agreed as a majority on how we'd like
to place the track.
(why would you need 3 extra modules?)
Iain
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Track on the modules
|
| (...) Actually, you should rephrase your comment to "It's not my fault you went ahead and built your town 3 plates deep back in 1995". But I'm not asking anyone to fit their layout to mine, in fact, the last two messages I've very obviously said I'm (...) (23 years ago, 5-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Track on the modules
|
| (...) Are you building me the three extra modules I now need? :) I'm going to try and figure out a way to fit my track out. (...) Well, it's really rather useful to have cordless tools. The jigsaw is by far the nicest because you don't fear cutting (...) (23 years ago, 5-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
39 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
