Subject:
|
Re: Track on the modules
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Tue, 5 Jun 2001 02:25:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
484 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Iain Hendry writes:
> I don't see why we don't use the PNLTC specs - Geometrically they operate
> nicely. It would be foolish to try and run the track according to road
> plates, anyway - the spacing would be all over the place. It makes far more
> sense to use one strip of 3 32x32 plates along the leading edge of the
> module for the track, then use the remaining 6 sectors for road plates. That
> is more realistic, anyway.
Are you building me the three extra modules I now need? :)
I'm going to try and figure out a way to fit my track out.
> > I've built two modules, third half done (frickin cordless saw ran out of
> > juice during a cut!)
>
> BATTERY POWERED SAW!!!!!!!!!! LMAO!!!!!!
Well, it's really rather useful to have cordless tools. The jigsaw is by
far the nicest because you don't fear cutting your own cord, or having to
have a dedicated table saw and maneouvre pieces into place. I hate fighting
the cord.
> > -going at 36 in, for the center of the track, fits better with Town
> layouts.
>
> What? I don't get this sentence :)
I believe putting the track at 36 dots in from the edge, ie, the track
centered evenly between roadplates, works nicely from the Town point of
view. The track geometry point of view is well, not so nice.
> > -the corners are gonna be trouble.
>
> Not if we use PNLTC specs ;)
They're still trouble on the inner corners as JeffVW has pointed out.
Calum
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Track on the modules
|
| "Calum Tsang" <tsangc@mie.utoronto.ca> wrote in message news:GEFqqr.EKo@lugnet.com... (...) No, run the two tracks close to the outer edge. 8 studs on centre, then another 12. (I think that's how they do it) Iain (23 years ago, 5-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | Re: Track on the modules
|
| "Calum Tsang" <tsangc@mie.utoronto.ca> wrote in message news:GEFqqr.EKo@lugnet.com... (...) more (...) That (...) I really don't think that's the issue - It's not my fault you went ahead and built your modules before we had all agreed as a majority (...) (23 years ago, 5-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Track on the modules
|
| "Calum Tsang" <tsangc@mie.utoronto.ca> wrote in message news:GEFIrv.MG1@lugnet.com... (...) edge. (...) because (...) I don't see why we don't use the PNLTC specs - Geometrically they operate nicely. It would be foolish to try and run the track (...) (23 years ago, 4-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
39 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
