Subject:
|
Re: Are we all too nice?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 19:26:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
321 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Selçuk Göre writes:
> I just give the example below:
>
> "Yeah, you are right, I already commented about your mother's sexual
> abilities last week, but you know, it was on .flame, do not take it
> seriously, so we are friends again right?"
>
> Wouldn't work.
This is absolutely true. If you write that (or worse) to/about me, I won't
forget it and you will basically forever count as worthless in my book.
And I won't ever seperate that from other contributions that you might
make. I think this is the only strong argument against the creation of
this group. (Actually, the only strong argument on either side.)
But, if you don't want to read those kind notes, you don't have to. It seems
like there are a bunch of weak (or potential) arguments in favor of the
creation of such a group and two bigger arguments against: the one illustrated
by Selçuk above, and the fact that it will take time.
Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Are we all too nice?
|
| (...) I hate to say it, but that's YOUR shortcoming (ignoring whether what the other person said was proof a shortcoming or not). I also take things personally....for a while. Usually a very short while. Rarely a very long time. I don't think (...) (24 years ago, 30-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Are we all too nice?
|
| Todd Lehman wrote: <snip> (...) <snip> Todd, of course you have the rule, and it will be your decision at the end but since you asked for opinions, I go for a very strong NO! You have reasons to consider for doing such a thing but I don't believe it (...) (24 years ago, 27-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
61 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
