To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 6837
6836  |  6838
Subject: 
Re: Are we all too nice?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 01:57:29 GMT
Viewed: 
1096 times
  
Christopher Weeks wrote:

> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Selçuk Göre writes:
> 
> > I just give the example below:
> > 
> > "Yeah, you are right, I already commented about your mother's sexual
> > abilities last week, but you know, it was on .flame, do not take it
> > seriously, so we are friends again right?"
> > 
> > Wouldn't work.
> 
> This is absolutely true.  If you write that (or worse) to/about me, I won't
> forget it and you will basically forever count as worthless in my book.
> And I won't ever seperate that from other contributions that you might
> make.  I think this is the only strong argument against the creation of
> this group.  (Actually, the only strong argument on either side.)

I hate to say it, but that's YOUR shortcoming (ignoring whether what the other
person said was proof a shortcoming or not).

I also take things personally....for a while.  Usually a very short while.  Rarely
a very long time.  I don't think there's any person on Lugnet I've been ticked off
at for a very long time, nor one I've been ticked off at for more than a week at
most in the entire Lugnet history.



> But, if you don't want to read those kind notes, you don't have to.  It seems
> like there are a bunch of weak (or potential) arguments in favor of the
> creation of such a group and two bigger arguments against: the one illustrated
> by Selçuk above, and the fact that it will take time.

Luckily, the time shouldn't be that much, and even if it were, it is CONSTRUCTIVE
time - any special filtering that Todd would have to put in place would be a
learning experience he could use in the future (in part or in whole) for other
groups.

I'm certainly for it, and might even read it from time to time.  Heck, I might
even post.  Most of my posts would be vents against TLG, not any particular
person, I would hope.

--
Tom Stangl
***http://www.vfaq.com/
***DSM Visual FAQ home
***http://ba.dsm.org/
***SF Bay Area DSMs



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Are we all too nice?
 
(...) This is absolutely true. If you write that (or worse) to/about me, I won't forget it and you will basically forever count as worthless in my book. And I won't ever seperate that from other contributions that you might make. I think this is the (...) (26 years ago, 27-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

61 Messages in This Thread:


























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR