Subject:
|
Re: Are we all too nice? (new name)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 17:57:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
353 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Kevin Salm writes:
> Flaming could and would be allowed here, but even general ranting and raving
> not directed at any specific individual would be appropriate here.
I certainly hope that there would be non-targetted venting, but I think that
diluting the purpose of this group too much would be a mistake. I hope that it
will be used infrequently, and adding appropriate topics/styles makes that less
likely.
> A good example of this might be:
> Instead of posting to lugnet.dear-lego and stating I WANT TECHNIC WHEELS AND
> TIRES SIZE YYxZZ AND I WANT TO BUY 100 AT A TIME FOR NO MORE THAN 30 CENTS A
> SET. HOW LONG IS IT GOING TO TAKE YOU BUMS AT LEGO DIRECT TO OFFER WHAT WE • ALL
> WANT ???
But there are already places to post such thoughts.
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Are we all too nice? (new name)
|
| (...) I prefer this term, also. Flaming could and would be allowed here, but even general ranting and raving not directed at any specific individual would be appropriate here. A good example of this might be: Instead of posting to lugnet.dear-lego (...) (24 years ago, 26-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
61 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
