Subject:
|
Re: Are we all too nice? (new name)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 25 Oct 2000 15:38:04 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
S.A.CAMPBELL@LARC.spamlessNASA.GOV
|
Viewed:
|
264 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote:
> This is ultimately a CFD (call for discussion) for a new newsgroup, but also
> asking what I think may be an important question. It's a taboo question, so
> do try to keep an open mind.
>
> The question is: Are we trying to be too nice to one another?
>
> (snip)
>
> I am wondering what people would think if there were a group
>
> lugnet.off-topic.debate.flame
>
> where, basically, anything goes: rudeness, complete gruffness, even
> profanity. (When I say anything, BTW, I mean anything but copyright
> violations or other illegalities, etc.)
I would like to politely offer another suggestion for the name of the group
lugnet.vent
I poffer this alternative because it is my opinion (and I am not attempting to
foist my own humble opinion on anyone) that Lugnetters will, at times, need to
yell, scream, and curse about on-topic subjects.
And if you don't like it then I would like to politely suggest a few anatomically
and politically incorrect procreation options.
thank you for your time
SteveC
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Are we all too nice? (new name)
|
| (...) I prefer this term, also. Flaming could and would be allowed here, but even general ranting and raving not directed at any specific individual would be appropriate here. A good example of this might be: Instead of posting to lugnet.dear-lego (...) (24 years ago, 26-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
61 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
