Subject:
|
Re: Are we all too nice?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 18:24:14 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
292 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> I think this should be user configurable. It could be handled like the skip
> filters, except default to being filtered out. This also leads me to
> something
> that I've been thinking would be valuable. I wish the dots were colored or
> shaded or something to indicate the newsgroup. Dots in .flame or whatever
> could not appear as the default, and could be red if you set them to appear.
I thought about recommending that the skip-filter be set for the group to
automatically be excluded, but given the cookie nature of the feature, I'm not
sure that's possible.
I certainly think that by default no one should see the flame group, and that
it should take definite action by the user to view the group. If it's possible
to have this start including the flame group in the dots and on web interface
newsgroup lists, great- but the skip filter doesn't keep dots from appearing
when the thread goes to a group you have filtered out.
I agree that, if possible, a user should be able to include it in his normal
reading. But if not, more weight should be given to the idea that a user
should be required to take definite action to read it than to convenience,
IMHO.
eric
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Are we all too nice?
|
| (...) I think this should be user configurable. It could be handled like the skip filters, except default to being filtered out. This also leads me to something that I've been thinking would be valuable. I wish the dots were colored or shaded or (...) (24 years ago, 26-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
61 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
