To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 6808
6807  |  6809
Subject: 
Re: Are we all too nice?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 27 Oct 2000 02:35:20 GMT
Viewed: 
251 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jim Hughes writes:
Well, I have read all of these latest developments with some concern
and thought that a few comments were in order. For the most part I am
a little below the radar for the off-topic/debate crowd but I still read a
pretty fair percentage of the posts to LugNET and thought a different voice
might be useful.

[snip]

I am not sure I buy your Chernobyl Theory (that unless we can contain all
of the poisonous radioactivity it will eventually lead to a full scale • meltdown
and require brave Russians to dump sand by helicopter over the Lugnet server)
I suggest that it is possible to acheive ones goals here without resorting
to uncivil behavior. There are many other outlets for your stress, I dont
think that Lugnet necessarily needs to be one. I dont even think that the
internet needs to be one of them. This theory also suggests that
it is impossible (inhuman) to show restraint.

A flame group will not serve any constructive purpose (how many flame wars
have you read wherethere was any real resolution of the issue) but will
engender bad feelings amoung the participants, both in the flame group and
probably in any other group where these same participants interact, resulting
in an unintended spill over effect into the rest of the NG's. Because of this
I feel that over time the level of civility in general would decrease and
finally, back to where I started, I think that there would be an increase in
noise and decrease in content.

I agree whole-heartedly. I've long subscribed to the view that praise should be
public, abuse private. People should be encouraged to use e-mail if they have a
problem with a particular person - why does anyone feel that such
correspondence should have a public arena? If you think someone else may be
interested as well, just CC them. No need to clog up public newsgroups with
such stuff, even if it's hidden by default.

Just my $.02

ROSCO



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Are we all too nice?
 
Well, I have read all of these latest developments with some concern and thought that a few comments were in order. For the most part I am a little below the radar for the off-topic/debate crowd but I still read a pretty fair percentage of the posts (...) (24 years ago, 26-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

61 Messages in This Thread:


























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR