To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 5451
5450  |  5452
Subject: 
Re: Why can't we have a Lando: Lego's Race policy
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 2 May 2000 04:37:43 GMT
Viewed: 
31 times
  
Jeff Johnston wrote:

Xcalabur wrote:
It makes more sense to release
a brown head for a black man.  It makes sense to release a red head for an
Indian (done in 1977?)

I think that's pretty insulting, actually.  It'd be kinda like using a black
head (with white inking? shades of the minstrel shows) for a black man.  Or
using LEGO yellow for Oriental people.  (The only reason that's not insulting
now is because *all* LEGO 'figs are yellow)

and it makes sense to have a yellow head for a
caucausian minifig (Luke, Han, etc.)

Say what?  I dunno about you, but *my* skin isn't LEGO yellow, or even close.
Using the "tan" color would make far more sense if you wanted a "real"
Caucasian 'fig.

You're both being silly.  They should use Belville pink.  ;)

oink,

LFB



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Why can't we have a Lando: Lego's Race policy
 
(...) I think that's pretty insulting, actually. It'd be kinda like using a black head (with white inking? shades of the minstrel shows) for a black man. Or using LEGO yellow for Oriental people. (The only reason that's not insulting now is because (...) (25 years ago, 2-May-00, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

66 Messages in This Thread:
























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR