To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 21969
21968  |  21970
Subject: 
Re: Finally--a use of public funding that I can really get behind!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 20 Aug 2003 18:42:14 GMT
Viewed: 
637 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Carl Nelson wrote:
  
As for cowboy diplomacy, I fully support it, as long as it follows this guideline: “Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, in order to assure the survival and the success of liberty.” If we have to do it alone, we will.

Too bad Bush added the line, “...Against any threat, real, imagined, or constructed out of thin air.” :-)

   Actually, my beef is primarily with bureaucrats and government employees (who tend to the liberal side; just look at the DC-area voting records) who think they know so well what is good for us. Good example: seat belts. I wear one because I know a bit about both physics and safety statistics. If I don’t wish to wear one, why should the government give a rat’s patootie?

The majority of voters in the DC area are black - whether or not they are bureasucrats and government employees I couldn’t say, but since even those need goods and services, I tend to doubt it.

I don’t have a problem with you not wearing a seat belt as long as you foreswear any public assistance whatsoever if you get into an accident, your fault or not, and the foreswearance of all those in the car with you (even if you aren’t driving, you can hurtle into another passenger or be ejected from the car into someone else). I should note that authorities may still not be satisfied, figuring that you are still endangering others, regardless of financial liablity.

  
The world would be a better place today if Iran and Iraq had managed to obliterate each other in their war. The US pursued a policy of supporting the lesser of two evils; the only problem is that when you get rid of the greater you’re still stuck with an evil.

We created one monster by our arrogance and then had to create another to counter the first when it went out of control (the second then promptyly went out of control, also). Trying to build up flakes like the Shah or Hussein in command was a mistake.


   No, I’m thanking my lucky stars that it’s Bush in office instead of Gore!

Inasmuch as I doubt Gore would have dragged us into an extremely ill-considered war with Iraq, let me politely note that lucky stars don’t seem to exist. Should I mention Enron going out of control? :-)

-->Bruce<--



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Finally--a use of public funding that I can really get behind!
 
(...) But what doesn't the guy misquote, eh? :) (...) I'm not sure about voters, but the population is 63% white, 26% black (higher than national average), 5% Asian, and 6% Hispanic ((URL)). I don't know how to go about calculating the areas of (...) (21 years ago, 20-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Finally--a use of public funding that I can really get behind!
 
(...) What's the point? You dislike Bush, I think he's doing a decent job, there's no common ground on the issue to make it worth discussing. (...) Red herring--bringing up a quote by one conservative and attributing it to all. It is pretty funny, (...) (21 years ago, 20-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

34 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR