To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 20455
20454  |  20456
Subject: 
Re: WMD, again...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 21 Apr 2003 22:25:36 GMT
Viewed: 
1782 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
> 
> > > Hey, I've said all along that if God appeared to me and made a convincing
> > > case, I'd believe that He exists.
> > 
> > "convincing case"  Do I detect a caveat?
> 
>  Not an intentional one.  I just meant that any powerful being, like Bill
> Gates or Ashley Judd, could appear before me and make claims of divinity.
> But I'd need to see/experience convincing evidence (even if it's accessible
> only to me) before I could believe in the divinity of the petitioner.
> 
> > > [1] Especially if He wiped away my student loans with a wave of His divine Hand.
> > 
> > lol An example of a "convincing case"?  So what if after having read this, I,
> > being a Christian man of substantial means (though sadly I am not; this is a
> > hypothetical), sent you a check for an amount greater than your student loans
> > because I believed God wanted it, would you then believe in the existence of
> > God? (the presumption being, as I believe, that God acts through His followers).
> 
>  In that case I'd probably be more kindly disposed to at least one
> Christian (thereafter referred to as my benefactor)!

A-ha!  If *I* did send a windfall your way, no way would I take credit-- I'd
sign the card "from God, to Dave!" :-)

> > Aside from that and since we are on the subject of God, I have a question for
> > you if you care to answer-- What is the difference in reasoning between an
> > Atheist and a Deist?  I am not able to come up with anything.
> 
> I haven't done too much research on Deism, but my general sense is that
> Deists acknowledge (or believe in) a Creator/deific entity who hasn't really
> involved him/her/itself since the time of creation.  Sort of like winding a
> clock and letting it run.  This is compatible with certain theories of
> Intelligent Design, but not really with Christianity, for example.
> Atheists, in contrast, generally don't worship or believe in any
> god/creator/deity.  There's a whole rainbow of different kinds of atheism
> ranging from strict materialists to solipsists to postmodern "It's all a
> matter of perspective"-types.  The difference is that, for atheists, there's
> no belief in or worship of the god figure, even if such a figure is accepted
> to exist.

Whoa, you lost me.  Are you saying that it is possible for an Atheist to accept
the existence of a God?

> Deism is, in daily life, very similar to atheism and can actually be a
> sort of bulwark for someone not comfortable with full-blown atheism (ie, "I
> want to believe in *something*")  Many of the founding fathers were Deists,
> by the way.
> 
> Does that provide a suitable answer?

Thank you.  I suspected as much, that Atheism and Deism were similar.  Neither
acknowledges that the existence of God is provable, yet a Deist believes anyway
(leap of faith).  Now it seems to me that an Atheist also takes a leap of faith
of sorts by not believing in something that is by definition unprovable.  That
is, whether one believes in God or not is a sort of toss up-- Deists seem to me
to be Atheists who accept the existence of God and not much else without any
justifiable reason other than, as you mentioned, personal comfort level.

I guess my question for you and other Atheists would be: why choose Atheism and
not Deism?

JOHN



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: WMD, again...
 
(...) Does He have to use stamps, or does he just create the card in my mailbox? (...) I think so (though not for me personally). I think the deal is that the atheist doesn't worship the god in question. Maybe this analogy would work: I believe in (...) (24 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: WMD, again...
 
(...) Not an intentional one. I just meant that any powerful being, like Bill Gates or Ashley Judd, could appear before me and make claims of divinity. But I'd need to see/experience convincing evidence (even if it's accessible only to me) before I (...) (24 years ago, 21-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

35 Messages in This Thread:











Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR