Subject:
|
Re: WMD, again...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 21 Apr 2003 20:26:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
260 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
> > Given: Bush is wrong and deceitful
> > Hypothesis: Evidence is found to support that Bush is truthful and correct
> > Conclusion: Evidence is wrong or planted.
>
> Provide me with facts that disprove the "given" part -- prove to me that
> Bush is right and honest.
>
> I'm not seeing it on my own.
Last time I checked one was *presumed* innocent until proven guilty in this
country.
JOHN
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: WMD, again...
|
| (...) Unless you're an Arab, or have an Arab-sounding name, or have been to an Arabic nation recently, or know someone who fits any of the above criteria. Then you can be held indefinitely as an "enemy combatant," and no presumption of innocence (...) (21 years ago, 21-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: WMD, again...
|
| (...) Your response is a tired joke in this case -- I think that Shrub's lack of ability in most areas of his past life show he is not trustworthy. What members of his cabinet do in his name shows me he is not trustworthy (Ashcroft re: Patriot Act). (...) (21 years ago, 21-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: WMD, again...
|
| (...) Provide me with facts that disprove the "given" part -- prove to me that Bush is right and honest. I'm not seeing it on my own. -- Hop-Frog (21 years ago, 21-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
35 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
