Subject:
|
Re: WMD, again...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 21 Apr 2003 20:13:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
253 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
> Given: Bush is wrong and deceitful
> Hypothesis: Evidence is found to support that Bush is truthful and correct
> Conclusion: Evidence is wrong or planted.
Provide me with facts that disprove the "given" part -- prove to me that
Bush is right and honest.
I'm not seeing it on my own.
-- Hop-Frog
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: WMD, again...
|
| (...) I appreciate you trying to create an analogy that you think I might find relevant:-) But if you claimed this, how exactly could I expect to get "independent confirmation" of your claim? Personally, I'd use 2 criteria in consideration of your (...) (22 years ago, 21-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
35 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
