To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 20452
20451  |  20453
Subject: 
Re: WMD, again...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 21 Apr 2003 21:28:40 GMT
Viewed: 
245 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler

<snipped stuff with which I am not necessarily in disagreement>

Hey, I've said all along that if God appeared to me and made a convincing
case, I'd believe that He exists.

"convincing case"  Do I detect a caveat?

I wouldn't necessarily worship him (ie; proof of His existence does not
violate my free will), but I'd accept his existence [1].

Dave!

[1] Especially if He wiped away my student loans with a wave of His divine Hand.

lol An example of a "convincing case"?  So what if after having read this, I,
being a Christian man of substantial means (though sadly I am not; this is a
hypothetical), sent you a check for an amount greater than your student loans
because I believed God wanted it, would you then believe in the existence of
God? (the presumption being, as I believe, that God acts through His followers).

Aside from that and since we are on the subject of God, I have a question for
you if you care to answer-- What is the difference in reasoning between an
Atheist and a Deist?  I am not able to come up with anything.

JOHN



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: WMD, again...
 
(...) Not an intentional one. I just meant that any powerful being, like Bill Gates or Ashley Judd, could appear before me and make claims of divinity. But I'd need to see/experience convincing evidence (even if it's accessible only to me) before I (...) (21 years ago, 21-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: WMD, again...
 
(...) You could just ask me two different times... 8^) Anyway, you've given a nice summary of the problem of Revelation as evidence. Well said. (...) To let you (and myself) somewhat off the hook--part of my hypothetical situation was that Jesus (...) (21 years ago, 21-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

35 Messages in This Thread:











Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR