To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 20458
20457  |  20459
Subject: 
Re: WMD, again...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 21 Apr 2003 22:51:23 GMT
Viewed: 
395 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Costello writes:
I would say successfully launching campaigns to remove both the Taliban and
Husein regime from power was a great accomplishment, whether you agree with • his >motivations for those actions or not.

Could you show me where in the federal Constitution the invasion of foreign
territories is explicitly laid out as part of the duties of the U.S. President?

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of
President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve,
protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

If the president deems a threat to our nation exists in foreign territory, then
he is bound by oath to defend against it.

Then the argument goes towards whether it was an imminent threat, an actual
threat, etc-- matters of interpretation.

You may disagree with him, but the justification is there.

JOHN



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: WMD, again...
 
(...) If the justification is there it is implicit, not explicit. Pedro (22 years ago, 21-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: WMD, again...
 
(...) A threat to your Nation exists everywhere, should then your President start a world war to wipe out anything that could someday cause a tragedy? If he considers your attitude is a threat to your countries values of peace and freedom, should (...) (22 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: WMD, again...
 
(...) Could you show me where in the federal Constitution the invasion of foreign territories is explicitly laid out as part of the duties of the U.S. President? I must have missed that day in civics class... Pathetic republican apologists unite! -- (...) (22 years ago, 21-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

35 Messages in This Thread:











Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR