Subject:
|
Re: The role of ethics (was: The Free Super Chiefs)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sun, 24 Mar 2002 19:17:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
538 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> This whole topic comes down, in my opinion, to meaningless without
> agreeing on the role of some kind of ethics.
>
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jeremy Scott writes:
> > Note: It is against my rules to post here but because of the recent
> > activity, which was caused by me, I decided to break that rule to
> > address this issue and not ignore it. However, I am not here to stay...
>
> :-)
[snip]
Please respect Jeremy's wish to end his part in this debate...
-Suz
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | The role of ethics (was: The Free Super Chiefs)
|
| This whole topic comes down, in my opinion, to meaningless without agreeing on the role of some kind of ethics. (...) :-) (...) My first thought was that you were probably lying. After all, what adult would say that? You claim to be fifteen and that (...) (22 years ago, 24-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
64 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
