To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 152
151  |  153
Subject: 
Re: The meaning of Christmas (was Re: Christmas Train update
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sat, 12 Dec 1998 19:42:42 GMT
Reply-To: 
BEAKER@antispamPOBOX.COM
Viewed: 
530 times
  
Also sprach Steve Berry:
: No offense, but could you be taking Larry's side on this because he comes
: close to your own ideological stance on this issue? Or, is it because, as you
: say, footnoting something divisive in a Trains newsgroup is o.k.?

Has Matt said anything that indicates one way or the other his beliefs?
Or do you just automatically assume that anyone who disagrees with you
must be an infidel?

It's only divisive if you allow it to be.  Some of us tend to accept
both proclamations of faith and atheism as what they are, matters of
personal opinion, and decline to make issues of them.  Can you not do
the same?

/ _ _ / _ _     No animals were harmed in the production of this post.
()(-(//((-/
============= Jim Baker -- Weather Weasel Extraordinaire ==============



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The meaning of Christmas (was Re: Christmas Train update
 
(...) even >though he doesn't believe in the Christ part? Sure, if that had been the topic (...) Matt, No offense, but could you be taking Larry's side on this because he comes close to your own ideological stance on this issue? Or, is it because, (...) (26 years ago, 12-Dec-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

66 Messages in This Thread:





























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR