Subject:
|
Re: Bid retractions (was Re: eBay dead again)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.theory
|
Date:
|
Thu, 23 Mar 2000 20:23:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1773 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.market.theory, Adam Hoekwater writes:
> Wait, do you mean "if the winner retracts his offer" or "if the current high
> bidder retracts his bid"? Are we talking about completed auctions now? I
> think that if you placed the second highest bid, and the highest bidder
> retracts his bid, and the auction hasn't ended yet, then you are the high
> bidder and will be required to buy it. At least that's how I see it.
I would never use any auction system that _required_ me to be held to a bid
in such a way. I'd love to have the _option_ to place my bids in such a way,
but for that to be the default, no way...that's just yet another formula for
anguish among bidders.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Bid retractions (was Re: eBay dead again)
|
| (...) BTW, if I understand what people are saying about eBay, if you do get stuck with one of your old bids that got reinstated at the end because some other bloke reneged at the end, do -can- renege on your bid, yes? You don't go to eBay jail or (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Bid retractions (was Re: eBay dead again)
|
| (...) Wait, do you mean "if the winner retracts his offer" or "if the current high bidder retracts his bid"? Are we talking about completed auctions now? I think that if you placed the second highest bid, and the highest bidder retracts his bid, and (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
60 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
