Subject:
|
Re: What do you do when you never receive your package?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.shipping
|
Date:
|
Mon, 9 Oct 2000 15:31:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2718 times
|
| |
|
|
> In lugnet.market.shipping, Rob Doucette writes:
> > "richard marchetti"
> > Rob, Lar:
>
> SNIP
> > seller's word that the items were mailed is simply not good enough -- he
> > must either produce proof of mailing, the goods themselves, or a refund in
> > this instance.
> Agreed, these are points I stated, although not directly.
> > Where's the argument here?
> My initial reply was not in response to Frank, it was in response to John.
> My argument is that liability for lost/damaged shipments can and is often
> (conditionally) transferred to the buyer. Rob.
Well, To me, the whole shipping thing is the most complicated and vague of all
the selling and trading issues, a lot of unknowns and unproveables. I do not
think that you can transfer the liability to the buyer, maybe in writing with
the buyers signature, but you're saying with a verbal agreement? What would
stop the scammers from taking it to the extreme? I can't see how a verbal
agreement would overrule PO Regulations. I asked at my PO about this very
issue, "If I tell the buyer I won't be responsible if they don't insure" and I
was told, nope, you are still responsible, why? the scammers. You should check
it out at the PO next time you go in and talk to the Inspector. John
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
37 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
