Subject:
|
Re: What do you do when you never receive your package?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.shipping
|
Date:
|
Sun, 8 Oct 2000 19:34:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2347 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.market.shipping, Rob Doucette writes:
> In lugnet.market.shipping, John Hadd writes:
> > > > > Major Snippage>
> > > In lugnet.market.auction, Rob Doucette writes:
> > > It is my policy and that of most LEGO sellers that the buyer is responsible
> > > for insurance.
> >
> > I don't have a problem with a seller not wanting to Insure an Item, but the
> > seller is still responsible to deliver the item. Giving the buyer the option
> > does not get the seller out of it.
>
> I disagree as long as I can show (mostly through e-mail dialogue) that there
> was an agreement that burden of liability is on the buyer AND I can show proof
> of shipment (USPS, UPS receipt). If liability for lost/damage is clearly
> communicated and agreed upon to be on the buyer, I doubt you'd have much luck
> pursuing a claim through the USPS.
I'm with Rob on this which is why I disclaim liability as a seller and require
delivery conf, it's not an option for my sales. Further, if the buyer buys
insurance, my liability is extended only to the point where I am now requiring
myself to assist with the recovery process, and that is IT.
I may have to participate in a claim, an incoming from Oz fell apart enroute
and the stickers from it were lost, not sure how to determine the value of
just the stickers so I may just eat the loss, didn't really NEED the stickers
anyway.
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
37 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
