Subject:
|
Re: LEGO for Life Sweepstakes
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 5 Oct 1999 15:14:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1105 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, David Eaton writes:
> In lugnet.general, Steve Bliss writes:
> > Well, they obviously have their sites set too low. I can't believe the
> > "how many LEGO products do you own?" topped out at 10. Geez.
<snip>
> Yeah, I rather hope (expect, even) that the numbers they get back are
> something like:
> 0-1: 0.2%
> 2-3: 0.6%
> 4-5: 1.8%
> 8-9: 1.3%
> 10+: 96.1%
I can't think of *anyone* I know, nephews and neighbors included, that don't
have either 0-1 or 10+.
James
http://www.shades-of-night.com/lego/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LEGO for Life Sweepstakes
|
| (...) I know a few... mostly, I'd say people fall in the "under 10" category or "way over 10" category. My younger brother and sister's collection (they don't care for it nearly as much as I) is about 4 or 5 sets... Also, our neighbors family has a (...) (25 years ago, 5-Oct-99, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LEGO for Life Sweepstakes
|
| (...) Yeah, that was kind of a disappointment... I would have expected at least something like 20 or maybe even 50... (...) I think probably there's more of a danger in it in this respect. If you bought your kids 12 sets, and you therefore fit in (...) (25 years ago, 5-Oct-99, to lugnet.general)
|
47 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
