General Discussion : 336


General / 336	335 \| 337

Subject:	Re: What is complete (was Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.general
Date:	Wed, 28 Oct 1998 21:53:51 GMT
Reply-To:	{mattdm@mattdm.org}AvoidSpam{}
Viewed:	2810 times

Larry Pieniazek <lpien@NOSPAM.ctp.com> wrote: > However, and most importantly, complete is what you say it is. :-) For example, I'm all-the-lego-I-can-afford-and-then-some complete. -- Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/

Message is in Reply To:

		What is complete (was Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?)
(...) I think most completists agree that a total reissue (if under a different number) does not take the place of the original set. So if they reissed an M:tron set, you'd need both versions to be M:tron complete. (1) Analogy is with the (...) (27 years ago, 28-Oct-98, to lugnet.general)

25 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search