Subject:
|
Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 26 Oct 1998 12:50:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1747 times
|
| |
|
|
"Tim Courtney" <tcourtney@nospam.avenew.com> writes:
> Those in general, plus other Insectoids-secific parts. I don't know
> for sure the magnitude of Lego's mold obsessiveness, since I don't
> own one. I think it was definitely a step in the wrong direction for
> them.
So you do not like new specialized pieces, is that correct? Well, I
remember when the space theme appeared for the first time. The
magnitude of new specialized pieces was huge! And I loved it! The more
specialized pieces, the better. In my neighbourhood, the boy with the
most specialized space pieces was the coolest.
I've grown more mature by now, but I still like the introduction of some
new pieces, becuase it makes me able to build a wider range of models.
> Maybe if enough classic lovers send messages somehow, they'll at
> least re-issue some of the most popular sets...
That doesn't make sense to me. To me, LEGO is a construction toy, not
collection items. I only buy LEGO to be able to build various models,
not to collect them. So I don't think LEGO should rerelease old sets
for the sake of some adult collectors. I hope this wasn't too
controversial.
Fredrik
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?)
|
| (...) Those in general, plus other Insectoids-secific parts. I don't know for sure the magnitude of Lego's mold obsessiveness, since I don't own one. I think it was definitely a step in the wrong direction for them. Maybe if enough classic lovers (...) (26 years ago, 26-Oct-98, to lugnet.general)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
