Subject:
|
New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 24 Oct 1998 23:55:10 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm.!antispam!org
|
Viewed:
|
1627 times
|
| |
|
|
Tim Courtney <tcourtney@nospam.avenew.com> wrote:
> I couldn't disagree more. Lego should go back to simplified minifigs, they
> look much better. I think it is a mistake for them to go away from the
> classics they built their toy empire on.
I do like the classic minifigs, but I do like a lot of the new ones too.
I'd love to see a re-issue of classic sets, but on the whole I'm pleased
with the current line. Sure, town is looking terrible, and the last few
years of space and castle have been weak too, but Insectoids and
(especially) Ninjas show a lot of promise. And of course, Mindstorms is
wonderful.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?)
|
| (...) I don't see much in Insectoids. The main reason is that they have so many specialized pieces. If they built the same shapes with the pieces they had five years ago, I would be all for them. Lego can't really go anywhere with Ninja, what other (...) (26 years ago, 25-Oct-98, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: More 1999 Figs... ?
|
| (...) I couldn't disagree more. Lego should go back to simplified minifigs, they look much better. I think it is a mistake for them to go away from the classics they built their toy empire on. Also, I have noticed that since I have been off of RTL (...) (26 years ago, 24-Oct-98, to lugnet.general)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
