Subject:
|
Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 26 Oct 1998 16:46:00 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm.{AvoidSpam}org
|
Viewed:
|
1925 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> The problem (for me) is that the Insectoids sets (at least the smaller
> ones) are only really good for building that one model. They aren't as bad
> (in this respect) as Time Cruisers sets were, but they aren't as generally
> useful for building as pre-UFO space (or even pre-Explorien, if you
> prefer).
I dunno. I've built several different ships using insectoid pieces -- and
my creations don't look insectoid in the least....
> Besides, those darn Insectiod legs don't even bend at the knee! If
> they had been made with some amount of rotation (like, if they came
> apart at the knee, and could be put back together at different
> angles), they would be much more useful. That would have redeemed
> them, in my eyes.
Yes, I agree heartily here. Even better if they would interface nicely with
technic, for making walking robots...
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?)
|
| (...) The problem (for me) is that the Insectoids sets (at least the smaller ones) are only really good for building that one model. They aren't as bad (in this respect) as Time Cruisers sets were, but they aren't as generally useful for building as (...) (26 years ago, 26-Oct-98, to lugnet.general)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
