Subject:
|
Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 26 Oct 1998 16:46:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1599 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
Thomas Main writes:
> Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> > Ok, now, those are cool sets. But, take a look more closely -- they've got
> > specialized pieces all over. And sure, the minifigs have classic smilies --
> > but they don't have the even-more-classic non-movable arms & legs w/ blank
> > faces.
>
> BTW, how many people integrate both the older and newer minifigs in
> their layouts? I've decided to have both in my town. It's kinda like
> having two different races.
I'm often undecided about whether or not I like new pieces. The biggest factor
that pursuades me is how useful I think it is across themes. Even purists argue
amongst themselves saying that they won't use a piece until they think it
useful, usually solving some kind of connection they can't make any other way.
Is it a lowering of standards then? IMO, after much consideration, no. The only
thing that could lower TLG's standards regarding pieces is whether they don't
fit/color match/stay together, or are outrageously priced. The rest is subject
to my imagination and yours.
More often, I prefer to use more of my imagination rather than accept new
pieces. Yet when 2x2 plate turntables came out, I thought they were the
greatest thing since sliced bread. It's all so subjective. I guess I really
appreciate the use of imagination more than anything. If someone uses a piece
in a way in which I never have, I find it interesting at least.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?)
|
| (...) BTW, how many people integrate both the older and newer minifigs in their layouts? I've decided to have both in my town. It's kinda like having two different races. They are similar in many ways but there are some important differences too. (...) (26 years ago, 26-Oct-98, to lugnet.general)
|
25 Messages in This Thread: ![More 1999 Figs... ? -Pawel Nazarewicz (24-Oct-98 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: More 1999 Figs... ? -Tim Courtney (24-Oct-98 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: More 1999 Figs... ? -Matthew Miller (24-Oct-98 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: More 1999 Figs... ? -Tim Courtney (24-Oct-98 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?) -Matthew Miller (24-Oct-98 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?) -Tim Courtney (25-Oct-98 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?) -Colin Gutierrez (25-Oct-98 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?) -Matthew Miller (25-Oct-98 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?) -Richard W. Schamus (27-Oct-98 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?) -Jesse Long (27-Oct-98 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?) -Matthew Miller (27-Oct-98 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?) -Tom Stangl (26-Oct-98 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?) -Larry Pieniazek (28-Oct-98 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?) -Matthew Miller (25-Oct-98 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?) -Tim Courtney (26-Oct-98 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?) -Fredrik Glöckner (26-Oct-98 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?) -Matthew Miller (26-Oct-98 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?) -Thomas Main (26-Oct-98 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?) -Steve Bliss (26-Oct-98 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?) -Matthew Miller (26-Oct-98 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?) -Tim Courtney (27-Oct-98 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?) -Tom McDonald (28-Oct-98 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![What is complete (was Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?) -Larry Pieniazek (28-Oct-98 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: What is complete (was Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?) -Matthew Miller (28-Oct-98 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|