Subject:
|
Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 26 Oct 1998 07:57:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1714 times
|
| |
|
|
Colin R Gutierrez wrote:
>
> Various people wrote:
>
> > > > I couldn't disagree more. Lego should go back to simplified
> > > > minifigs, they look much better. I think it is a mistake for them to
> > > > go away from the classics they built their toy empire on.
>
> I like the variety of newer faces for lego minifigs, but in some cases,
> I think TLG's gone too far*. I mean, printing a very intricate face on
> the standard yellow LEGO head seems a bit like putting a spoiler on a
> Model-T IMO.
And exactly WHAT is wrong with a spoiler on a Model T? Especially if it
has a bigblock, big'n'littles, and runs over 150 in teh 1/4 ;-)
--
Tom Stangl
***http://www.vfaq.com/
***DSM Visual FAQ home
***http://ba.dsm.org/
***SF Bay Area DSMs
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?)
|
| (...) Different strokes for different folks (1). That rig will never get you even 10 points in a concours. And a 90 point concours T would never be seen at the drag strip, much less have its E.T.s painted in the window. Myself, I can admire both the (...) (26 years ago, 28-Oct-98, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?)
|
| (...) I like the variety of newer faces for lego minifigs, but in some cases, I think TLG's gone too far*. I mean, printing a very intricate face on the standard yellow LEGO head seems a bit like putting a spoiler on a Model-T IMO. That's not to say (...) (26 years ago, 25-Oct-98, to lugnet.general)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
