Subject:
|
Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 25 Oct 1998 19:34:41 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdmSTOPSPAMMERS.org
|
Viewed:
|
1806 times
|
| |
|
|
Tim Courtney <tcourtney@nospam.avenew.com> wrote:
> I don't see much in Insectoids. The main reason is that they have so many
> specialized pieces. If they built the same shapes with the pieces they had
I dunno. They've got the legos, which would be more useful if they were
movable, but still can be applied elsewhere. And the wings are pretty
special-purpose, but they look cool anyway. :) What other specialized pieces
are you referring to?
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?)
|
| (...) Those in general, plus other Insectoids-secific parts. I don't know for sure the magnitude of Lego's mold obsessiveness, since I don't own one. I think it was definitely a step in the wrong direction for them. Maybe if enough classic lovers (...) (26 years ago, 26-Oct-98, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?)
|
| (...) I don't see much in Insectoids. The main reason is that they have so many specialized pieces. If they built the same shapes with the pieces they had five years ago, I would be all for them. Lego can't really go anywhere with Ninja, what other (...) (26 years ago, 25-Oct-98, to lugnet.general)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
