Subject:
|
What is complete (was Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 28 Oct 1998 20:29:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2090 times
|
| |
|
|
Tim Courtney writes:
> two tiniest M:Trons because I need those to be M:tron
> complete :)
I think most completists agree that a total reissue (if under a different
number) does not take the place of the original set. So if they reissed an
M:tron set, you'd need both versions to be M:tron complete. (1)
Analogy is with the metro/retro station. To be 9V complete you need both. They
have different numbers.
Now, I think most completists don't go so far as to require that you have every
variant of a set with the same number, if the variants are language or country
specific differences only.
However, and most importantly, complete is what you say it is. :-)
1 - unless the new version came out as M:Tron II, in which case you would not
need it. By analogy with Blacktron I and II... you don't need any BT II sets to
be BT I complete and vice versa.
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?)
|
| (...) Those in general, plus other Insectoids-secific parts. I don't know for sure the magnitude of Lego's mold obsessiveness, since I don't own one. I think it was definitely a step in the wrong direction for them. Maybe if enough classic lovers (...) (26 years ago, 26-Oct-98, to lugnet.general)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
