To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 302
301  |  303
Subject: 
Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Mon, 26 Oct 1998 12:35:39 GMT
Viewed: 
1742 times
  
Matthew Miller writes:
Tim Courtney <tcourtney@nospam.avenew.com> wrote:
I don't see much in Insectoids.  The main reason is that they have so many
specialized pieces.  If they built the same shapes with the pieces they had

I dunno. They've got the legos, which would be more useful if they were
movable, but still can be applied elsewhere. And the wings are pretty
special-purpose, but they look cool anyway. :) What other specialized pieces
are you referring to?

Those in general, plus other Insectoids-secific parts.  I don't know for sure
the magnitude of Lego's mold obsessiveness, since I don't own one.  I think it
was definitely a step in the wrong direction for them.  Maybe if enough
classic lovers send messages somehow, they'll at least re-issue some of the
most popular sets....  I would like to see re-issues of the Galaxy Explorer,
the Futuron monorail, the BT1 Base, that light and sound big fat classic
starship, and the two tiniest M:Trons because I need those to be M:tron
complete :)

-tim <><
http://trc.osiriscomm.com



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?)
 
(...) So you do not like new specialized pieces, is that correct? Well, I remember when the space theme appeared for the first time. The magnitude of new specialized pieces was huge! And I loved it! The more specialized pieces, the better. In my (...) (26 years ago, 26-Oct-98, to lugnet.general)
  Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?)
 
(...) What other insectoids-specific parts? I think I've given you a comprehensive list. There's also the trans-yellow/green "eye" domes, but those seemed more generally useful than just insectoid, so I didn't count them. But even with those: three (...) (26 years ago, 26-Oct-98, to lugnet.general)
  What is complete (was Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?)
 
(...) I think most completists agree that a total reissue (if under a different number) does not take the place of the original set. So if they reissed an M:tron set, you'd need both versions to be M:tron complete. (1) Analogy is with the (...) (26 years ago, 28-Oct-98, to lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?)
 
(...) I dunno. They've got the legos, which would be more useful if they were movable, but still can be applied elsewhere. And the wings are pretty special-purpose, but they look cool anyway. :) What other specialized pieces are you referring to? (26 years ago, 25-Oct-98, to lugnet.general)

25 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR