Subject:
|
Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 27 Oct 1998 19:48:20 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
MATTDM@MATTDM.antispamORG
|
Viewed:
|
4863 times
|
| |
|
|
Jesse Long <LongJR97@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I think they're taking into account the non-haired people (hats, helmets,
> etc, which could have been any gender. Back then, they didn't provide extra
> hair pieces for people with hats, so they could be whatever you wanted them
> to be.
Right, yes. I had mostly space sets back then, and who could tell under
those suits? :)
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New vs. old (was Re: More 1999 Figs... ?)
|
| Richard W. Schamus wrote in message ... (...) a (...) that (...) If (...) hold (...) there (...) me (...) the (...) I think they're taking into account the non-haired people (hats, helmets, etc, which could have been any gender. Back then, they (...) (28 years ago, 27-Oct-98, to lugnet.general)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
