Subject:
|
Re: LEGO Company announces poor performance in year 2000
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 2 Mar 2001 17:59:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
642 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Suzanne D. Rich writes:
> If it looks too good to be true, it probably is. Just to play devil's • advocate,
> why believe them? If Mattel stepped out and said, "Barbie stamps a bad image • on
> young girls. We're sorry. We'll fix all that now." what would you think? Now,
> what other meanings can you imagine those words having?
um, big boobs sell dolls. Juniorized sets don't sell.
>
> But what about their plan for World Domination? that's out there waiting for • its
> date stamp.
World Domination, WTF? Do you mean trying to become the #1 recognized
brand around the world or something else?
>
> I don't just mean AFOLs.
> BTW, we're a tool, not a market.
10% *is* a market.
KL
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LEGO Company announces poor performance in year 2000
|
| (...) Because they've said it directly to my face. I didn't believe it, not in the way most folks here see it meaning. I saw a face that wanted (in a fantasy) to have things back-to-basics, but was having say something else. The words spoken to me (...) (24 years ago, 1-Mar-01, to lugnet.general)
|
41 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
