Subject:
|
Re: LEGO Company announces poor performance in year 2000
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 1 Mar 2001 20:58:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
741 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Scott Sanburn writes:
> Ray & All,
>
> > BTW (moving off on a tangent), did anyone else notice
> > what was conspicuous by
> > its absence form the recent catalog ? How about Knights
> > Kingdon, Arctic & Rock
> > Raiders. Where'd they go ?
>
> If I remember right, they are on two year cycles, and I
> think all the ones you mentioned are on it.
Rock Raiders, yes, I think so... 1999 sets.
Arctic and Knights Kingdom?? I'm not sure about that, aren't they 2000 sets?
So they're not quite at end of life yet.
Note that, IIRC, the Spring catalog traditionally has been the "lightest"
and entire lines are sometimes omitted with no implication of their early
termination.
++Lar
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: LEGO Company announces poor performance in year 2000
|
| "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> skrev i meddelandet news:G9JE9r.8LM@lugnet.com... (...) Speaking of 'light' catalogs, my reaction to the Swedish 2001 catalog was: "The heaviest I ever seen (when put on a scale), but not so much Lego (...) (24 years ago, 2-Mar-01, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
41 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
