Subject:
|
Re: The problem I have with upcoming product hoaxes
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 16 Jun 2000 14:56:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2742 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.general, Brian Kasprzyk writes:
> > In lugnet.general, Patrick J. Shepard writes:
> > > (800 pounds of foolishness removed)
> > >
> > > Geesh, can't you take a joke?
> >
> > I understood your posting as very obvious joke. But, a year ago, when I • first
> > started looking at Lugnet, I saw the 121 train question and wasted several
> > hours researching it. I was not happy to come to a site that I thought was a
> > true Lego site for people who loved the bricks and be deceived by a bogus • Lego
> > set. I basically stopped looking at Legnet after that. I started looking
> > again recently and low and behold, another bogus posting and add created. I
> > agree with the first posting. That type of deception should be done • somewhere
> > else.
>
> I haven't decided how I feel about "serious" hoaxes yet, although I tend to
> side with you that they can be bad.
>
> But I have to say that you got incredibly unlucky if the first two things you
> saw were both hoaxes, and both by Ben. That is extremely unlikely, the
> percentage of hoax material here is way way way less than 1%.
>
> Don't give up on LUGNET as a whole, it's an incredible resource (not the only
> one, mind you, there's brickset and brickshelf and some others I can't • remember
> too).
>
> ++Lar
It's scary to think about the probability of it! I am trying to keep an open
mind because it IS a way to see some really creative models. I am working on
my own web page. Hopefully, people will like it. I have been building with
Lego for years and have some nice layouts. I'm like most modelers, I open my
boxes and use them! Thanks for the response.
BK>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: The problem I have with upcoming product hoaxes
|
| (...) I haven't decided how I feel about "serious" hoaxes yet, although I tend to side with you that they can be bad. But I have to say that you got incredibly unlucky if the first two things you saw were both hoaxes, and both by Ben. That is (...) (26 years ago, 16-Jun-00, to lugnet.general)
|
50 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
