To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 19074
19073  |  19075
Subject: 
Re: The problem I have with upcoming product hoaxes
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Fri, 16 Jun 2000 14:56:06 GMT
Viewed: 
967 times
  
In lugnet.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
In lugnet.general, Brian Kasprzyk writes:
In lugnet.general, Patrick J. Shepard writes:
(800 pounds of foolishness removed)

Geesh, can't you take a joke?

I understood your posting as very obvious joke.  But, a year ago, when I • first
started looking at Lugnet, I saw the 121 train question and wasted several
hours researching it.  I was not happy to come to a site that I thought was a
true Lego site for people who loved the bricks and be deceived by a bogus • Lego
set.  I basically stopped looking at Legnet after that.  I started looking
again recently and low and behold, another bogus posting and add created.  I
agree with the first posting.  That type of deception should be done • somewhere
else.

I haven't decided how I feel about "serious" hoaxes yet, although I tend to
side with you that they can be bad.

But I have to say that you got incredibly unlucky if the first two things you
saw were both hoaxes, and both by Ben. That is extremely unlikely, the
percentage of hoax material here is way way way less than 1%.

Don't give up on LUGNET as a whole, it's an incredible resource (not the only
one, mind you, there's brickset and brickshelf and some others I can't • remember
too).

++Lar

It's scary to think about the probability of it!  I am trying to keep an open
mind because it IS a way to see some really creative models.  I am working on
my own web page.  Hopefully, people will like it.  I have been building with
Lego for years and have some nice layouts.  I'm like most modelers, I open my
boxes and use them! Thanks for the response.

BK>



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: The problem I have with upcoming product hoaxes
 
(...) a (...) But not both hoaxes were by Ben (you're talking about the AT-AT hoax, not so? That was Greg M.'s). Still, very low probability, there weren't many hoaxes here. -Shiri (24 years ago, 16-Jun-00, to lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The problem I have with upcoming product hoaxes
 
(...) I haven't decided how I feel about "serious" hoaxes yet, although I tend to side with you that they can be bad. But I have to say that you got incredibly unlucky if the first two things you saw were both hoaxes, and both by Ben. That is (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jun-00, to lugnet.general)

50 Messages in This Thread:


















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR