To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 14055
14054  |  14056
Subject: 
Re: Who oversees the rec.toys.LEGO newsgroup?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Mon, 24 Jan 2000 14:51:49 GMT
Viewed: 
864 times
  
Todd Lehman wrote:

In lugnet.general, Richard Marchetti writes:
[...]
I don't use profanity here on Lugnet largely because Todd insists on it and
not because I agree with this policy -- which I don't, I think its silly.

It's hardly silly at all, actually...  It may be unfortunate for some,
perhaps, but it's a completely sound logical decision nonetheless.  And
it actually has nothing whatsoever to do with personal preferences[1] or
worrying whether kids[2] are reading.

The reason is simple:  The excessive gutter language and flamewars in RTL is
what drove many good people away (in frustration, horror, disbelief, etc.)
during 1994-1998.  I could name at least ten who specifically left at various
times as a result of uncivilities amplified by unnecessary obsceneties.

That's sad, and it's not a situation we need to repeat here.

--Todd

[1] I use various obsceneties in daily conversation just as any adult does.
[2] Kids have already heard it on the playground or somewhere else on the net.

I agree with Todd, it's why I left RTL in 1999.  The Mad Hatter was the final
straw.

Gary Istok



Message has 1 Reply:
  Who documents rtl? (Was: Who oversees the rec.toys.LEGO newsgroup?)
 
(...) Man, now I gotta go back into deja.com and see how stupid someone had to be to completely alienate someone as smart and creative as Gary. Which leads me to wonder... As alt.forlklore.urban and some other usenet groups had people taking notes (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Who oversees the rec.toys.LEGO newsgroup?
 
(...) It's hardly silly at all, actually... It may be unfortunate for some, perhaps, but it's a completely sound logical decision nonetheless. And it actually has nothing whatsoever to do with personal preferences[1] or worrying whether kids[2] are (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)

50 Messages in This Thread:


















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR