Subject:
|
Re: Mad Hatter and RTL (Was Re: Who documents rtl?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 31 Jan 2000 20:30:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2659 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Paul Baulch wrote:
[snipped interesting analysis and color commentary of Mad Hatter bruhaha]
I must have missed parts/most of the Mad Hatter thing. I don't think I did, but
I must have. I feel the Mandroid mess was way worse than the Mad Hatter mess.
> I am giving up rec.toys.lego. More recently, there have been certain
> off-topic cross-posts (i.e. spam) of an offensive nature (one was racist and
> another seems to have been pornographic). Neither this sort of thing nor the
> flamewars/profanity bother me[1]. I'm just sick of the overwhelming
> proportion of market-related posts. IMO they should have made
> rec.toys.lego.marketplace and I'm still baffled as to why they didn't.
FYI, there has always been spam of various types posted to RTL. RTL has just
been fortunate to have readers with proper authority to (quickly) cancel the
spam.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Mad Hatter and RTL (Was Re: Who documents rtl?)
|
| Sproaticus wrote in message <388C8BED.3BCCF9F@io.com>... (...) final (...) to (...) Definitely, go to Deja-News and read the Mad Hatter thread. The poster known as "Mad Hatter" was not stupid. Egotistical, certainly. Immature, without doubt. Rude, (...) (25 years ago, 29-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
50 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
