Subject:
|
Re: Voting Comments
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 18 May 1999 15:31:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1041 times
|
| |
|
|
On Tue, 18 May 1999 08:31:02 GMT, Fredrik Glöckner
<fredrik.glockner@bio.uio.no> wrote:
> BUT: It will make the part look stupid in L3P->POV-Ray, because the
> piston will consist of a cylindrical surface below and above the
> pegholes, then a jagged surface in the middle, and even holes between
> them. This was what I wanted to avoid by using the partially rotated
> 1-4cyli.dats.
>
> So what do you want? Plague or cholera? ;-)
You can minimize the jagged appearance by using a 1-8cyli.dat around the
hole. This leaves the minimum amount of surface around the holes to be
jagged in POV-Ray.
And if you rotate all the primitives to center your 1-8cyli parts on the
peg-holes, you won't have mis-matched vertices in LDraw and LDLite.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Voting Comments
|
| (...) That's a really great idea! It's obvious you're pretty experienced with LDraw. I'll do the changes when I get home. Fredrik (26 years ago, 19-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Voting Comments
|
| "John VanZwieten" <john_vanzwieten@msn.com> writes: It's a good thing you spend so much effort to verify the parts! (...) It is probably a bad practice to use two 1-4cyli.dats on each side and rotate them partially to make space for the peg hole, as (...) (26 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
60 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
