Subject:
|
Re: Voting Comments
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 18 May 1999 08:31:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
723 times
|
| |
|
|
"John VanZwieten" <john_vanzwieten@msn.com> writes:
It's a good thing you spend so much effort to verify the parts!
> 2851: This may be getting a bit picky for this part, but where the
> peg holes meet the rounded edge, this surface is modeled as flat,
> rather than rounded. As a result, the 1-4cyli.dats do not match up
> to the 4-4cyli.dats. This is mostly noticable in ldlite with shading
> on.
It is probably a bad practice to use two 1-4cyli.dats on each side and
rotate them partially to make space for the peg hole, as I did. A
better practice would probably be to inline two 2-4cyli.dat on each side
and then cut out the space required for the peghole. This will make the
part render better in LDLITE with shading. I can do that.
BUT: It will make the part look stupid in L3P->POV-Ray, because the
piston will consist of a cylindrical surface below and above the
pegholes, then a jagged surface in the middle, and even holes between
them. This was what I wanted to avoid by using the partially rotated
1-4cyli.dats.
So what do you want? Plague or cholera? ;-)
> 2854: There are little gaps on either side of the "canyon" where the
> axlehole is open on its side. I think in the following lines, 3
> should be replaced with 4.
> 4 16 -1 -1 -10 -3 -1 -10 -3 -1 0 -1 -1 0
> 4 16 -1 1 -10 -3 1 -10 -3 1 0 -1 1 0
> 4 16 1 -1 10 3 -1 10 3 -1 0 1 -1 0
> 4 16 1 1 10 3 1 10 3 1 0 1 1 0
Thanks for noticing this! I haven't checked it out yet, but I will
check it out at home. (I have a sizzling new computer at home, so I
don't have to sneak in at work at nights to model parts anymore. I
finally got to finish off a few parts, too. Look at the
lugnet.cad.dat.parts group.)
I had a really hard time verifying this part, but could not find any
problems with it. I'm glad you did. I'll fix it and send the
corrections to Terry K.
Fredrik
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Voting Comments
|
| (...) You can minimize the jagged appearance by using a 1-8cyli.dat around the hole. This leaves the minimum amount of surface around the holes to be jagged in POV-Ray. And if you rotate all the primitives to center your 1-8cyli parts on the (...) (26 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Voting Comments [DAT]
|
| (...) It took me a while, but here are my comments on the current batch of voting parts. Since others have looked closely at the patterned baseplates, I ignored those. 2851: This may be getting a bit picky for this part, but where the peg holes meet (...) (26 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
60 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
